NEWS
New Feature!!!! University Subject Rankings in 12 branches
FOR SCIENTIST REGISTRATION FOR INSTITUTIONAL BULK REGISTRATION
FOR EDIT YOUR UNIVERSITY / INSTITUTION PAGE
Some differences of the AD Scientific Index
New Feature!!!! University Subject Rankings in 12 branches
List without CERN, Statistical Data etc. Only in AD Scientific Index
New Feature!!!! University Subject Rankings in 12 branches
AD
Scientific Index 2024
About Us
Methodology
Compare & Choose
Contact - FAQ
login
Login
person_add
Register
insights
i10 Productivity Rankings
format_list_numbered
Citation Rankings
school
University Rankings
subject
University Subject Rankings
insights
Subject Rankings
place
Country Rankings
format_list_numbered
Top 100 Scientists
format_quote
Top 100 Institutions
local_fire_department
Country Top Lists
Amanda Warren Jones
University of Huddersfield - Huddersfield / United Kingdom
Law / Law and Legal Studies
AD Scientific Index ID: 5115729
Edit Form
Registration, Add Profile,
Premium Membership
Ranking &
Analysis
Job
Experiences (0)
Education
Information (0)
Published Books (0)
Book Chapters (0)
Articles (0)
Presentations (0)
Lessons (0)
Projects (0)
Congresses (0)
Editorship, Referee &
Scientific Board (0 )
Patents /
Designs (0)
Academic Grants
& Awards (0)
Artistic
Activities (0)
Certificate / Course
/ Trainings (0)
Association &
Society Memberships (0)
Contact, Office
& Social Media
person_outline
Amanda Warren Jones's MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
1-)
Patenting DNA: A lot of controversy over a little intangibilityA Warren-JonesMed. L. Rev. 12, 97, 2004232004
2-)
A Mouse in Sheep\'s Clothing: The challenge to the patent morality criteria posed by\'Dolly\'A Warren-JonesEuropean Intellectual Property Review 20 (12), 445-452, 1998211998
3-)
Vital parameters for patent morality—a question of formA Warren-JonesJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2 (12), 832-846, 2007152007
4-)
Patenting Rdna: Human and Animal Biotechnology in the UK and EuropeA Warren-JonesLawtext Publishing Ltd., 2001142001
5-)
Identifying European moral consensus: why are the patent courts reticent to accept empirical evidence in resolving biotechnological cases?A Warren-JonesEuropean Intellectual Property Review 28 (1), 26-37, 2006132006
ARTICLES
Add your articles
We use cookies to personalize our website and offer you a better experience. If you accept cookies, we can offer you special services.
Cookie Policy
Accept